首页> 外文OA文献 >Traumatic thoracic ASIA A examinations and potential for clinical trials
【2h】

Traumatic thoracic ASIA A examinations and potential for clinical trials

机译:Traumatic thoracic asIa a examinations and potential for clinical trials

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Study Design: Retrospective review of prospective databaseObjectives: To define the variability of neurologic examination and recovery after non-penetrating complete thoracic spinal cord injuries (ASIA A).Background Data: Neurologic examinations after SCI can be difficult and inconsistent. Unlike cervical SCI patients, alterations in thoracic (below T1) complete SCI (ASIA A – based on the ASIA Impairment Scale [AIS]) patients’ exams are based only on sensory testing, thus changes in the neurological level (NL) are determined only by sensory changes.Methods: A retrospective review of the placebo control patients in a multicenter prospective database utilized for the pharmacologic trial of Sygen. Patients were included if they had a complete thoracic SCI on initial evaluation, with completed ASIA examinations at follow-up weeks 4, 8, 16, 26 and 52. Specifically, pin prick (PP) and light touch (LT) were assessed and the absolute change was calculated as the number of spinal levels at a given observation time. Results 3165 patients were initially screened for the Sygen clinical trial, of which 57 were the control placebo patients used in this analysis. Alterations from the baseline exam (PP and LT) were fairly consistent and the median change/recovery in neurologic examination was one spinal level. Across all observations post-baseline, the average change for PP was 1.48 +/- 0.13 (mean +/- SE), and for LT, 1.40 +/-0.13. There were equal proportions of directional changes (none, improved, lost).Conclusions: Changes in a thoracic complete (ASIA A) SCI patient ASIA examination as measured through sensory modalities (PP/LT) are fairly uncommon. The overall examination had only 1-2 level variability across patients, indicating minimal change in the sensory exam over the follow-up period. Stability in the ASIA examination as measured through sensory modalities has thus been demonstrated over time, making it an excellent tool to monitor changes in neurologic function.
机译:研究设计:前瞻性数据库的回顾性研究目的:定义非穿透性完全性胸脊髓损伤(ASIA A)后神经系统检查和恢复的变异性。背景数据:SCI后的神经系统检查可能困难且前后不一致。与颈椎SCI患者不同,胸廓完全改变(T1以下)(ASIA A –基于ASIA障碍量表[AIS])的患者检查仅基于感觉测试,因此仅确定神经系统水平(NL)的变化方法:在用于Sygen药理试验的多中心前瞻性数据库中对安慰剂对照患者进行回顾性回顾。如果患者在初次评估时具有完整的胸部SCI,并在随访的第4、8、16、26和52周完成了ASIA检查,则将其包括在内。具体而言,评估了针刺(PP)和轻触(LT)并评估了绝对变化计算为给定观察时间的脊柱水平数量。结果最初筛选了3165例患者进行Sygen临床试验,其中57例是本分析中使用的对照安慰剂患者。基线检查(PP和LT)的变化相当一致,神经系统检查的中位变化/恢复为一个脊柱水平。在基线后的所有观察中,PP的平均变化为1.48 +/- 0.13(平均值+/- SE),而LT的平均变化为1.40 +/- 0.13。方向改变的比例相等(无,无改善,消失)。结论:通过感觉方式(PP / LT)测量的胸完全(ASIA A)SCI患者ASIA检查的改变非常少见。整个检查在患者之间只有1-2级差异,表明在随访期间感觉检查的变化很小。因此,随着时间的流逝,已经证明了通过感觉方式测量的ASIA检查的稳定性,使其成为监测神经功能变化的极佳工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号